I’m a firm believer that 9/11 was an inside job. Because there are 1000s of reasons on the Internet why a few raggedy Saudis could not have done it, I have not read all the theories.
This morning, this theory popped into my puny brain.
The questions and theories of why World Trade Center building 7, which was not hit by an aircraft, also fell on 9/11 are often thought as “the smoking gun” in this crime.
What about if United Flight 93, the ill-fated plane that crashed in the rural fields of Pennsylvania, was not really routed by the “terrorists” to Washington DC as many claim, but was scheduled to hit WTC7?
If the “insiders” who did 9/11 were planning to crash a third plane in New York City, that plane would probably have been scheduled to hit WTC7.
In my theory, a floor in WTC7 was the staging area for the 9/11 “attacks”. This floor had much of the incriminating evidence of what was to be. Because of this, explosive charges had also been set in WTC7 along with the charges set to take down WTC 1 and 2. And of course, a third plane, United 93, would have “taken down” this third building.
But plans failed, as all perfect plans must, and United 93 was probably shot down by accident by US Air Force planes which did not get the “stand down” orders from Washington as most fighters in the Northeast USA had been ordered.
So, the “insiders” had a dilemma.
They had incriminating evidence in WTC7 and the building had already been rigged with explosives to be detonated after United 93 crashed into it, like the other two buildings.
They could not allow this building to stand.
Maybe this theory has been out there, but I have not read it yet.
(Yes, this theory has been proposed before, and in fact on the Naudet Brothers documentary, "9-11", you can hear the emergency responders being told a third plane is on its way to New York. - WRH)
Here's the clip WRH may have mentioned above: