9/11 Another Fake Looking Plane Video From Across The Brooklyn Bridge (VIDEO)

...

After researching the subject for years and collecting thousands of hours of material on this event, I can tell you there is something very wrong with 90% of the Flight 175 videos. There is 20 half-way convincing shots and 180 shots of a shape changing, frame jumping, wing disappearing, non-light reflecting black blurry blob from some of the finest cameras in the world at the time. Many of the videos show a level straight approach from the south (like this one) while others show a steep straight decent from the statue of liberty (NY1 and NBC 'orb') while even others such as the ABC black sillouette ( perspective size stays the same as it approaches) helicopter feed video shows a banked turn coming in level from the statue hitting the face at a hard oblique angle (would have cut the corner and came out the east face) according to the butter building vs. titanium wing physics we see in the videos. The 200 foot object enters like butter at 500mph (?), disappearing into 250 feet of building material without any visible damage to itself but stops in the last 50 feet of the same material it flew into like butter? There is something wrong here. We see the wings go right into a stronger denser material, without damage or instant velocity loss on impact. Not one wing of the four at the site came off in the impacts with a WTC tower. Velocity is the energy that would be converted to blasting a plane shaped hole in the face and crushing the plane. The energy would all be conserved and transferred equally to smashing the objects as the velocity is lost. Cars stop very quick when they hit telephone poles as the energy is converted back into crushing the car and the telephone pole equally. No velocity loss or damage to your car when you hit a telephone pole, either there was no energy converted to the crushing the car and the pole, there was additional energy or material added to the process, or the car or pole are not really there. Cars do not drive through each other before slowing or receiving damage in head on collisions. 9/11 is the ONLY case where Newton's three basic universal laws of motion do not apply to a collision between two objects or objects falling into themselves. Notice we do not see air turbulance in the large amount of powdered blasted dust coming out the entry hole. Why does 500 yards of blasted concrete powder fly out the entry hole with very little visible flame in it? What produces that effect that we see in the everyday world? It is very obvious what we are seeing here, there is a pattern far outside coincidence you cant miss in the unified collection of available plane videos. The litanny of flaws in the official script never ends because it is all a scripted lie. Research 9/11, every facet. Demand full verifiable measurable recreatable provable observable evidence and question all suspicious unlikely or impossible claims. Do not follow my opinion nor anybody elses, careful not to chase theories we cannot prove, think for yourself, and dont let ANYONE fool you.

...