A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that calling for someone to kill the President of the United States cannot be classified as a threat because standing law does not prohibit "predictions or exhortations" to violence.
In a 2-1 decision, judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California resident Walter E. Bagdasarian was engaging in free speech when he wrote that Obama "will have a 50 cal in the head soon," then called on someone to "shoot the nig."
~
WOW !
ReplyDeleteYes, WOW!
ReplyDeleteGOOD MORNING, MR CHIMP ! I SEE YOU ARE UP AND RUNNING THROUGH THE JUNGLES ~ HAVE A GREAT DAY ~
ReplyDeleteOOPS! Just slipped on a banana peel. Who left that there? Have a great day Sunny!!!
ReplyDeleteYEAH, WHO LEFT IT THERE ? I KNOW WHO ~ THE ONES WHO ARE STEALING OUR SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE,AND FOOD HAVE FOUND THEIR WAY INTO *YOUR* FOOD SUPPLY ALSO! WE ALL BETTER BE CAREFUL. OVER AND OUT, C'YA LATER~
ReplyDelete"There is nevertheless insufficient evidence that either statement constituted a threat or would be construed by a reasonable person as a genuine threat by Bagdasarian against Obama."
ReplyDeleteI would say an REASONABLE person would consider them exactly that. WTF is going on here?
I get the feeling that the ONEPERCENTERS want a revolution. They are doing everything to instigate the poor and what's left of the middle class and now giving permission to assassinate?
ReplyDeleteCould be, but...revolutions have a way of getting way out of hand. Surely they know this.
ReplyDeleteThat's what the 4000 fema concentration camps, SWAT teams, police tanks, pain cannons are for.
ReplyDelete